Premium Content:

Catholic Code of Behaviour May Discipline LGBT Teachers

Cross

According to the Independent Education Union, a code of behaviour being proposed by the Catholic employers in NSW and the ACT may put LGBT teachers at risk of being disciplined for their private lives.

- Advertisement -

The code is part of a clause in a new enterprise bargaining agreement put forward by the Catholic Commission for Employment Relations.

The Independent Education Union has expressed concerns that the code may be intrusive and could put teachers at risk of suspension for their behaviour outside of working hours.

The union represents teachers in Catholic school and has been in negotiations with the Catholic Commission for Employment Relations for nearly a year.

“[The code is] a series of statements that we believe are far too intrusive into the private lives of people merely because they work in a Catholic school,” union spokesman John Quessy told the ABC.

“Gay and lesbian relationships, in vitro fertilisation, people who are not married, particularly married in the church, and therefore people who have broken no law, no civil law, can be disciplined for doing that,” Quessy said.

“To be quite honest, the most vocal critics are our members who are practising Catholics. They’re the ones who say that it’s intrusive.”

The Catholic Commission for Employment Relations has said in a statement that the clause would not change current procedures in Catholic schools.

“What employers have proposed is entirely consistent with arrangements that are in place now,” the statement said.

“The union needs to focus on concluding negotiations as soon as possible.”

Negotiations are scheduled to continue next week.

OIP Staff

Image: YAY Micro

Latest

On This Gay Day | 'The Crying Game' premiered in 1992

The film was groundbreaking when it was released.

Jolyon Petch teams up with Bianca for a new take on an Aussie party classic

It's a song Absolutely Everybody loves.

Pope Leo has private audience with Reverend James Martin

The US priest heads an organisation that advocates for LGBTIQA+ people in the church.

City of Perth extends lease for Pride Centre until 2030

The Pride Centre has become a central meeting spot for the local LGBTIQA+ communities.

Newsletter

Don't miss

On This Gay Day | 'The Crying Game' premiered in 1992

The film was groundbreaking when it was released.

Jolyon Petch teams up with Bianca for a new take on an Aussie party classic

It's a song Absolutely Everybody loves.

Pope Leo has private audience with Reverend James Martin

The US priest heads an organisation that advocates for LGBTIQA+ people in the church.

City of Perth extends lease for Pride Centre until 2030

The Pride Centre has become a central meeting spot for the local LGBTIQA+ communities.

Cle Morgan shares heartbreaking story after impressing the coaches on ‘The Voice’

Audiences will remember the singer from her time on 'Australian Idol'.

On This Gay Day | 'The Crying Game' premiered in 1992

The film was groundbreaking when it was released.

Pope Leo has private audience with Reverend James Martin

The US priest heads an organisation that advocates for LGBTIQA+ people in the church.

1 COMMENT

  1. Sounds like the Catholic Church is trying to promote the new film “Love is Strange”.

    To quote the Luna Palace website:
    LOVE IS STRANGE, starring Academy Award© Nominee, John Lithgow and Alfred Molina, tells the story of a New York couple who after nearly four decades, are finally able to marry. But when news of their nuptials reaches the Catholic school where George works, he is immediately fired and they are forced to live apart.

    Same scenario as they are apparently seeking to have “permission” to engage in – namely fire LGBTI staff who don’t “hide in the closet”.

    Funny how the Catholic Church seems to have no trouble operating in Tasmania, where this sort of (to my eyes) unconscionable behaviour would not be legally allowed. (I.e. the church has no “special rights” like they are apparently trying to include in an industrial award.)

    To my eyes, if they are getting taxpayers funds to help run their schools, they should not be seeking to impose their selective morals on others, particularly when their “own house” is hardly “free of sin”.

Comments are closed.